ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the size of access channel that may influence the intrarenal pelvic pressure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods From April 2014 to July 2015,83 patiens with unilateral renal calculus,ranged from 20 to 40mam were divided into 2 group randomly.40 cases underwent F24 channel PCNL and 43 cases underwent F16 channel PCNL.There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative variables,such as age,gender,preoperative status of infection,status of hydrpnephrosis,size and location of stone (P ＞ 0.05).We used a 6Fr ureteral catheter positioned into the renal pelvic,and the intrarenal pelvic pressure was measured by anesthesia monitor IBP channel during PCNL in different stages (entrance into the collecting system,calculi fragmentation,and termination)for all patients.Removing calculus time,postoperative hemoglobin changing,fever rate,procalcitonin abnormal rate,white blood cell counts and calculi clearance rate were recorded and compared.Results The intrarenal pelvic pressure in different stages on F24 channel and F16 channel were (7.5 ± 1.3)、(22.5± 4.3)、(14.0 ± 2.7) mmHg and (10.3 ± 1.1)、(34.6 ± 4.1)、(23.0 ± 3.6) mmHg,respectively.There was statistically significant difference between 2 groups (P ＜ 0.05).Compared with F16 channel,F24 channel had significant differences in removing calculus time [(12.8 ± 3.7) min vs.(23.3 ± 3.6) min],fever rate [17.5％ (7/40) vs.39.5％ (17/43)],procalcitonin abnormal rate [15.0％ (6/40) vs.34.9％(15/43)] and white blood cell counts abnormal rate [10.0％ (4/40) vs.27.9％ (12/43)] (P ＜ 0.05).However,no significant difference in postoperative hemoglobin changing [(11.8 ± 4.4)g/L vs.(13.7 ±4.7)g/L] and calculi clearance rate [87.5％ (35/40) vs.81.4％ (35/43)] (P ＞0.05).Conclusions Compared with F16 channel,the F24 channel PCNL maintains lower renal pelvic pressure,which is less than reflux limit,during calculi fragmentation,It might be contributed to reduce the postoperative fever rate.It can short time for removing calculi and achieve the better effect.
ABSTRACT
Objective To access the safety and efficacy of balloon dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones.Methods Clinical data of 64 patients with staghorn stone according to the inclusion criteria in our institution from April 2013 to April 2014 were collected and analyzed retrospectively.According to the dilation methods,the patients were divided into balloon dilation group (dilated to 24 F by balloon dilator,31 cases) and fascial dilation group (dilated to 16 F by Amplatz fascial dilator,33 cases).There was no significant difference in sex,age,body mass index between the 2 groups.The data of duration of percutaneous access,one-attempt success rate of dilation,puncture complications (kidney calices fracture,perinephric fluid collection and postoperative delayed hemorrhage etc.),removing stones time,stone free rate,hemoglobin drop after surgery and number of patients who experienced postoperative fever ＞37.5 ℃ were recorded.Results Compare to fascial dilation group,balloon dilatation group had significant differences in terms of duration of percutaneous access [(5.6± 2.1) min versus (9.4± 1.7) min],oneattempt success rate of dilation[100％ (31/31) versus 88％ (29/33)],removing stone time[(32.4±3.4) min versus (49.5±3.7) min],stone free rate [84％ (26/31) versus 61％ (20/33)],hemoglobin drop after surgery [(16.7±3.3) g/L versus (28.4±2.6) g/L],renal intrapelvic pressure[(19±3) mmHg versus (25±6) mmHg] and rate of patients who experienced postoperative fever ＞37.5 ℃ [16％ (5/31) versus 39％(13/33)] (P＜0.05).No injury of adjacent organs,including pleura,liver,spleen,or bowel was noted in all patients.Conclusions Balloon dilation is quick and safe with less hemorrhage when building percutaneous renal channel.And it has higher stone free rate and less complication rate in percutaneous nephrolithotomy with staghorn stones.
ABSTRACT
Objective To access the practicality and safety of a new type Balloon dilatation combined with flank supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods Clinical data of 60 kidney stones patients were collected and retrospectively analyzed.This group of patients had been admitted and selected according to the inclusion criteria in our institute from July.2012 to Sep.2013.There was no obvious difference in sex,age,body mass index (BMI),stone location and size.According to the surgery approaches,this group of patients was divided into ballon group (dilated by balloon dilatation) and Amplatz group (dilated by Amplatz fascial dilation) and in each group there were 30 cases.All these patients received the surgery by the same group of surgeons.We collected the data of one-time success puncture rate,success puncture time,puncture complications (kidney calices fracture,perinephric fluid collection and postoperative delayed hemorrhages etc.),removing stones time and stone free rate.Results Compared with Balloon group,Amplatz group had a significant difference (P＜0.05) in one-time success puncture rate [100％ (30/30) vs 90％ (27/30)],success puncture time [(6.1±2.3)min vs (13.3±3.6)min],puncture complications [3％(1/30) vs 13％(4/30)] and removing stones time [(11.7±2.0)min vs (21.5±3.1)min]; but no significant difference (P＞0.05) in stone free rate [87％ (26/30) vs 83％ (25/30)].Conclusions Balloon dilatation combined with flank supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy is easy for surgery.It can establish the surgery access more accurately and faster,decreases removing stones time and reduces operative complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical characters and hemodynamic data of the prone position and supine position percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods Patients with kidney stones in 100 cases were randomly assigned into the supine position group and prone position group.There were 50 cases in each group.The following data were recorded at preoperative,intraoperative,change position:the blood pressure,heart rate,respiration,saturation of blood oxygen and blood gas analysis results.The VAS score was recorded in patients for postural comfort,dyspnea and pain score. Results The systolic blood pressure in the preoperative,intraoperative,postoperative on supine position and prone position were as follows:(137±12),(119±15),(115±17) mm Hg and (137±10),(110±18),(104±16) mmHg.The diastalic blood pressure was as follows:( 81 ± 9 ),(74 ± 8 ),(63 ± 14 ) mm Hg and ( 84 ± 8 ),(63 ± 9 ),(60 ± 15) mm Hg.Compared with preoperative,there was a blood pressure decreased in both groups.The blood pH at preoperative,intraoperative,postoperative in supine position and prone position:7.4 ± 0,7.3 ± 0,7.3 ± 0 and 7.4 ± 0,7.3 ± 0,7.3 ± 0.The bass excess (BE) of two groups were:(2.1 ± 0.5),(-2.7 ±0.5),( -1.5 ±0.5) mmol/L and (3.2 ±0.5),(-3.8 ±0.5),(-2.5 ±0.5) mmol/L.Compared with preoperative data,the pH and BE declined in both groups.The prone position had more pronounced decrease in serum sodium,serum potassium; but with no significant difference.Supine group in postural comfort and breathing difficulties were 1.6 ± 0.4 and 7.1 4± 05,while prone group were 7.5 ± 0.2 and 1.4 ± 0.3.The supine position showed better in postural comfort and breathing difficulties with statistical significance. Conclusions Compared with the prone position,the supine positioned percutaneous nephrolithotomy could have less influence on hemodynamics,blood gas analysis.It could have better postural comfort.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a new operative position, flank suspended supine position. Methods The new position hold affected flank suspended by raising the ipsilateral shoulder and haunch with two 3-liter saline bags, and set up waist bridge simultaneously. From March 2010 to October 2010, a series of 173 patients underwent PCNL with the new supine position under epidural anesthesia. The average age was (50± 11) years, and the average bulk of the stone was (2. 9±1.0) cm. All patients were placed in the new supine position. Under ultrasound guidance, the desired calix or pelvis was punctured near the posterior axillary line, then dilating the tract and establishing the 16 F or 20 F tract for PCNL. Results The pelvicaliceal system could be successfully approached in all patients. The procedure was well tolerated in all patients. Mean operation time was (86 ± 34) min. 80. 3% of the patients were rendered free of stones by the initial PCNL. Thirty-four cases had residual stones, and a second PCNL was performed in 16 cases to clear the residual stones. Only 1 patient required blood transfusion.None of the patients suffered visceral injury. Conclusion The new supine position is safe and effective for PCNL.